Ben & Jerry’s CEO Ousted Amid Political Dispute with Unilever
2 min read
A Corporate Clash Over Social Values | Corporate Activism
Ben & Jerry’s, the iconic ice cream brand known for its advocacy on social justice issues, is in the midst of a high-profile legal battle with its parent company, Unilever. The dispute escalated after Unilever allegedly ousted Ben & Jerry’s CEO, David Stever, without proper consultation, violating the terms of their merger agreement.
According to court filings, Unilever attempted to suppress Ben & Jerry’s longstanding “social mission,” which includes vocal support for LGBTQ+ rights, climate action, and more recently, a ceasefire in Gaza. The conflict intensified after Ben & Jerry’s accused Unilever of demanding that it stop publicly criticizing former U.S. President Donald Trump.
Legal Showdown: Unilever vs. Ben & Jerry’s
The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, claims that Unilever has “repeatedly threatened Ben & Jerry’s personnel, including CEO David Stever, should they fail to comply with efforts to silence the brand’s social mission.”
Unilever, however, has pushed back, stating that it followed appropriate consultation processes and that it is “disappointed that the confidentiality of an employee career conversation has been made public.” The corporation maintains that, as per the acquisition agreement, it retains the authority to appoint, compensate, and remove Ben & Jerry’s leadership following discussions with the independent board. | Ben & Jerry’s CEO Ousted
The Backstory: Ben & Jerry’s History of Activism
Since its founding in 1978 by Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield, Ben & Jerry’s has used its platform to advocate for progressive causes. The company was acquired by Unilever in 2000 under a unique merger agreement, which allowed an independent board to oversee its social mission.
However, tensions between the two entities have been rising for years. In 2021, Ben & Jerry’s halted sales in the West Bank, triggering a major corporate and political controversy. The rift deepened when the ice cream maker voiced support for Palestinian refugees and called for a ceasefire in Gaza, further clashing with Unilever’s corporate policies.
What’s Next?
The outcome of this legal dispute could have lasting implications for corporate activism. If Ben & Jerry’s prevails, it could set a precedent for how socially conscious brands operate under corporate ownership. If Unilever succeeds, it may reinforce the ability of parent companies to dictate the messaging and actions of their subsidiaries.
As this battle unfolds, consumers and advocacy groups will be closely watching, making this a pivotal moment for corporate governance and brand independence in the age of social responsibility. | Ben & Jerry’s Leadership Change
Ben & Jerry’s boss ‘ousted over political activism’
READMORE: Eugene “Big U” Henley Criminal Case
About The Author
